Bad social rep­u­ta­tion is some­thing the Visual Novel fan has learned to accept. But if you thought the whole Rapelay inci­dent didn’t really hurt our inter­est that much, think again…

The recent edit war between Minori (Wind, Ef) and the trans­la­tion group NNL may just lead to the com­plete scrap­ping of the Eden trans­la­tion project, one that is highly antic­i­pated by the vis­nov com­mu­nity and reviewed by Choux to be “one of the best” with Shinkai-Makoto-worthy art­work. But while an entire com­mu­nity vents against Minori for being xeno­pho­bic, Minori explains them­selves in self-defense, which included:

Each coun­try has their own cul­ture.… we real­ized that there are coun­tries that pun­ish mere pos­ses­sion of prob­lem­atic forms of expres­sion… Cur­rently, The bill that allows to lim­it­ing the con­tent to all ERO­GEs is being dis­cussed in the Diet because intel­lec­tu­als and politi­cians said ‘Japan­ese EROGE were being prob­lem­atic and trou­bled with the for­eign coun­tries.’

Pick­ing my mem­o­ries brings up that Minori started their xeno­pho­bic streak because of the Rapelay inci­dent.

So basi­cally the process goes like:

  1. West­ern­ers attack Japan over eroge because of iso­lated extremities.
  2. Japan moves to cen­sor eroge in order to defend itself.
  3. Japan­ese eroge com­mu­nity becomes angered by Impe­ri­al­is­tic West­ern­ers who think they have the right to judge and decide Japan­ese Cul­ture; xeno­pho­bia increases.
  4. Minori attacks trans­la­tion group in an pre­emp­tive strike to defend itself.
  5. Eng­lish Visual Novel com­mu­nity attacks Minori over its xeno­pho­bia; return to step 3.

Con­grat­u­la­tions mankind, we have once again suc­ceeded in form­ing yet another Cycle of Hate. Will we cut the links some­where? Or will we keep spin­ning out of con­trol? Because in this par­tic­u­lar inci­dent, we all made some poor deci­sions (I’m regret­ting my own incensed tweet against Minori).

Don’t involve Sion into this >.<

What’s my stand on the Rapelay case? I think the ‘game’ is dis­gust­ing, but ban­ning it is out­right stu­pid. Laws are made to be objec­tive, while moral­ity is sub­jec­tive in nature. There’s no more evi­dence that rape porn incites sex­ual assault any more than action movies incit­ing mur­der; wanna ban half of Hol­ly­wood over the chances? Besides, they learned since the print­ing press that the best way to make some­thing pop­u­lar is to ban it. Way to go British gov­ern­ment, six cen­turies and not a les­son learned.

Is Minori being unnec­es­sar­ily xeno­pho­bic? Def­i­nitely, espe­cially with the whole ‘installing our prod­ucts on a for­eign com­puter is a crime’ argu­ment. I under­stand their desire to use legal­ity to defend them­selves, and if this was because they’re local­iz­ing it then there wouldn’t be a war. But by attack­ing for­eign fans and deny­ing them alto­gether, they’ve antag­o­nized their only fans in the West. Worst PR action ever.

What about the Eng­lish Visual Novel com­mu­nity? Dear fans could at least try to under­stand Minori’s stand­point and nego­ti­ate in a proper man­ner, rather than scream­ing in all-caps rage like we have some kind of God-ordained right to piracy. You resolve xeno­pho­bia by being civil, not by being Impe­ri­al­is­tic West­ern­ers yourselves.

.

Pretty ironic this is all hap­pen­ing over some­thing called Eden isn’t it?

Pos­si­bly Related Posts

16 Responses to “The Circle of Hate in the Visual Novel Community: Eden’s Irony”
  1. Netto says:

    In my opin­ion, minori didn’t have to go to the extent of block­ing all for­eign access, but if you think it in a company’s man­ner, there’s a need for them to pro­tect them­selves from fur­ther “dam­age”. The best way is to limit access to their own com­mu­nity of peo­ple. After all, minori’s lat­est prod­ucts are often released in Japan first and I really doubt they would feel any hurt from dis­al­low­ing for­eign­ers to enter their site.

    You have to feel of the poor guys over at minori too. Whether if you’re a game devel­oper for a main­stream game or eroge, you would def­i­nitely want your prod­uct to be dis­played in a pos­i­tive light. By allow­ing the already-damaged Eng­lish VN com­mu­nity to touch, much less trans­late, their prod­uct, they prob­a­bly can’t help but to feel a lit­tle inclined to do some­thing to take the trans­la­tion project down. If the whole Raple­lay inci­dent didn’t hap­pen… well, this might not have happened.

    Best solu­tion to this issue? I don’t know, there are always peo­ple out there who would cause trou­ble for oth­ers, even if the issue is not a big one.
    .-= Netto´s last blog ..Project Diva – 2nd to be on sales at July 29th =-.

    • Aorii says:

      You’re exactly right, I’m def­i­nitely in the “com­pa­nies have a right to take the eas­i­est method of pro­tect­ing them­selves” camp. But attack­ing trans­la­tors is going out of the way to attract hate… that’s been the known trend as far as pub­lish­ers vs trans­la­tion com­mu­nity goes. If they are actively bring­ing this to Eng­lish, peo­ple could at least under­stand. But right now it just feels like being told “you gai­jins no play our games for only fel­low japan­ese”.
      Frankly, they’re in a worse light by keep­ing things in the dark, since they actu­ally HAVE a good prod­uct; hav­ing it be trans­lated by VN com­mu­nity and get­ting good reviews for story/char-quality rea­sons would HELP their reputation.

  2. anon says:

    Fix those and we’ll talk
    1. block­ing for­eign IP
    2. block­ing for­eign OS from play­ing their games
    3. jus­tify WTO for them­selves when they’re vio­lat­ing it by not allow­ing for­eign­ers to use the soft­ware
    4. get in war with the fans
    5. call­ing for­eign­ers pirate

    • Aorii says:

      1 & 2: Com­pa­nies have a right to tar­get only spe­cific cus­tomers; users do not have the right to use any site/product, that’s a priv­i­lege. Just like sites ban indi­vid­u­als for offen­sive behav­ior, they can ban groups. It’s not the right thing to do, but since they own it it’s their right to. If you can’t at least admit that, then you’re sink­ing to even lower than their level.
      3: I don’t know enough about how WTO mixes with inter­na­tional copy­right (which is a big mess to start with) to jump into that. I doubt most of the peo­ple in the argu­ment either… they’re just hold­ing onto what­ever rea­son they find.
      4. Already stated that’s a poor move on their part.
      5. Well, it’s TRUE isn’t it? Yes, there are some who actu­ally buy those games, but by and most the Eng­lish VN com­mu­nity just pirates. Even most of the Eng­lish VN fans on forums and blog­gers ADMIT they pirate.

  3. Janette says:

    The thing is, what Minori is doing is per­fectly legal. Like it or not, it’s true.

    Also, my beef with the whole Rapelay drama is we don’t have a place to com­plain. We show movies fea­tur­ing rape here in Amer­ica. We mar­ket games full of vio­lence. We don’t know if either of those incite those behav­iors in real­ity, and I won’t go into that. I’m just say­ing we have no place to talk. And we tar­get Japan? Yeah, real mature CNN.
    .-= Janette´s last blog ..Aniblog Tourny Day 9 Pre­dic­tions =-.

    • Aorii says:

      Oh def­i­nitely legal, never refuted that. But because they’re legal doesn’t mean they were huge @#$!s about it, which is the main issue =\
      Cul­tural hypocrisy runs ram­pant still. Peo­ple accuse each other of racism plenty, but cul­tur­ism? Some­one needs to stand up for the not-western countries.

  4. wuhugm says:

    me hand­some so me can own nukes, u not hand­some so dame

    me have mus­cle so me can spread porns, ye have not so just keep your porn for yerselves

    minori is dumb, just pre­tend that they don’t know shit about trans­la­tion or what­ever and this wouldn’t had happened

    • Aorii says:

      Real life doesn’t quite work like that. Com­pa­nies can’t nec­es­sar­ily get away from issues just by say­ing “we had no idea”.

  5. Kylaran says:

    Laws are made to be objec­tive, while moral­ity is sub­jec­tive in nature. ”

    I would sim­ply like to point out that this begs the ques­tion as to the nature of moral­ity; plenty of peo­ple would argue that morals are plenty objec­tive, and, in fact, pick out objec­tive and real things. In a world filled with rel­a­tivis­tic and anti-realistic view­points (par­tic­u­larly of moral­ity) it’s easy to say that a defined set of morals can be wrong. How­ever, I think that the peo­ple who argue that moral­ity is objec­tive are no more right than peo­ple who argue that it is sub­jec­tive. Ulti­mately, the law is deter­mined by who makes the more per­sua­sive argu­ment, and which com­mit­ment the peo­ple of that leg­isla­tive body are will­ing to com­mit them­selves to.

    And I don’t think it’s a mat­ter of the West vs. a non-western coun­try. I think this prob­lem is much deeply rooted in human behav­ior. Cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance under­lies the igno­rance behind moral­is­tic judg­ments, and, in my opin­ion, peo­ple are sim­ply more will­ing to dehu­man­ize and crit­i­cize an out-group than to recon­sider their own val­ues, no mat­ter what the nature of moral­ity truly is.

    That being said, I do think that it’s wrong for the West to crit­i­cize Japan for a largely domes­tic issue, sim­ply based on the prin­ci­ples behind the for­ma­tion of nation-states and rep­re­sen­ta­tion. But I also think that minori isn’t really help­ing the whole sit­u­a­tion by bring­ing out their xeno­pho­bia. They are, essen­tially, doing the same thing to for­eign­ers as the West has done to them. They shut off the West because there’s dis­so­nance when to Japan­ese vs. West­ern notions of art and enter­tain­ment; and, instead of look­ing at them­selves, they sim­ply brush off for­eign coun­tries as being unable to under­stand Japan, all the while jus­ti­fy­ing their seclu­sion through bull­shit rhetoric.

    Both sides are doing the same thing. And the sad thing is, no one both­ers to find a way out. Not that I blame minori though — there could be poten­tial domes­tic issues in the near future. They’re free to prac­tice what­ever sort of busi­ness they want to save their hides, even if it’s only effec­tive at piss­ing peo­ple off.

    • Aorii says:

      Plenty of peo­ple would argue that morals are plenty objec­tive“
      I tell those peo­ple to read the His­tory of Mankind and just how much our laws, and views, have changed our the centuries.

      You can argue that there are ‘objec­tive moral­ity’ when there is con­crete sup­port­ing evi­dence that it is harm­ful to oth­ers; in which case it is not the moral­ity that proves the neces­sity of a law, it is the infor­ma­tion. IMO, moral­ity will remain a view­point based on cir­cum­stances. For exam­ple, we can accept mur­der and trea­son to be wrong, but once it’s applied to some­one like Hitler it sud­denly becomes ‘hero­ism’. Can laws do this? It is right to mur­der a mur­derer? Mod­ern civ­i­liza­tion already dis­putes the tra­di­tional eye-for-an-eye morality.

      It IS deeply rooted in human behav­ior, but it seems to occur a lot today in West­ern vs. non-Western; on how West­ern govn’ts and groups claim­ing that cer­tain local cus­toms or laws or social expec­ta­tions are wrong, back­wards, or uncivil — who gave them the right to judge?

  6. xanimeman says:

    isn’t there a way to stop the skir­mish between fans by just open­ing a U.S. Branch V.N. store some­where where our trans­la­tors can work in peace and still be able to pro­vide us fans who buy the game at all (Y_Y)

    since there are sites that are try­ing to do that as well get­ting games to us legally trans­lated and approved by the mak­ers themselves(Y_Y)

  7.  
Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge